If your intention is to Trace a Straight Line Base Line, your Pivot will comply and you will be Hands to Pivot. Like bending over to pick something up, your brain sends your hand to the object, the body complies perfectly, without any thought to it. No need for conscious adjustments to waist bend, shoulder to hands alignment etc. We are well suited to this sort of movement we do it all day long. Take your pressure points to Top and then Trace or Thrust them at the Aiming Point on the way down. Thats about all there is to it.
The plane of the Shoulders and the plane of motion of the Hands do not need to be aligned. There is no mechanical reason for it. No benefit to be had. We dont reach for things in that manner outside of golf why do it when golfing? The body, the pivot , the shoulders go their way , the hands and arms go another. With the shoulders and arms united as single unit a conscious turn of the shoulders , Pivot to Hands will take the Hands back in the direction that the Shoulders are travelling............always under plane. Although some schools of thought then try to align the plane of the shoulders more closely to the inclined plane on the backswing. But why bother? Its a very awkward compensation.
That said, getting the Hands on the Inclined Plane defined by the Turned Right Shoulder ( the Turned Shoulder Plane) prior to Startdown does serve a purpose. Given the 6-M-1 Downstroke Sequence it will allow a move of the Right Shoulder to take the Hands Down the Inclined Plane in Startdown. To initiate Startdown with an independent movement of the Hands or Arms would break the Pivot Train. A movement of the Right Shoulder with the Hands aligned to a higher plane would take the Hands out over the Inclined Plane. But its still Hands to Pivot if, as in the Startdown Waggle exercise, the turn of the Pivot pulls the butt of the club towards the plane line, base line. The brain is still in the Hands. Most likely felt as a strong sense of the #2 pp being pulled longitudinally and the #3 pp being loaded.
The plane of the Shoulders and the plane of motion of the Hands do not need to be aligned. There is no mechanical reason for it. No benefit to be had. We dont reach for things in that manner outside of golf why do it when golfing? The body, the pivot , the shoulders go their way , the hands and arms go another. With the shoulders and arms united as single unit a conscious turn of the shoulders , Pivot to Hands will take the Hands back in the direction that the Shoulders are travelling............always under plane. Although some schools of thought then try to align the plane of the shoulders more closely to the inclined plane on the backswing. But why bother? Its a very awkward compensation.
That said, getting the Hands on the Inclined Plane defined by the Turned Right Shoulder ( the Turned Shoulder Plane) prior to Startdown does serve a purpose. Given the 6-M-1 Downstroke Sequence it will allow a move of the Right Shoulder to take the Hands Down the Inclined Plane in Startdown. To initiate Startdown with an independent movement of the Hands or Arms would break the Pivot Train. A movement of the Right Shoulder with the Hands aligned to a higher plane would take the Hands out over the Inclined Plane. But its still Hands to Pivot if, as in the Startdown Waggle exercise, the turn of the Pivot pulls the butt of the club towards the plane line, base line. The brain is still in the Hands. Most likely felt as a strong sense of the #2 pp being pulled longitudinally and the #3 pp being loaded.
Hmm?
Quote:
2-H SHOULDER MOTIONS
....But the Shoulders do have crucial On Plane functions – synchronizing and aligning the Pivot Motion and Thrust with those of the Power Package (Chapter 6). “On Plane” Right Shoulder Motion is possible only by titling its axis – the spine. See 7-14. In this area the Left Shoulder is helpless. The geometry of Shoulder Control deals only with Right Shoulder, for there are no guide lines for Left Shoulder control of the Right Shoulder. Therefore, variations in Right Shoulder location will vary the Left Shoulder location at Impact and, consequently, the Low Point location as well as the Angle of Approach (2-N).
Being a part of the Pivot and the Power Package, the Right Shoulder must reconcile them by moving with the greatest precision for thrust, speed, direction and distance. (7-3) So the Right Shoulder does not flap around haphazardly – it has many responsibilities. And variations in its Impact location will vary the Right Elbow’s Impact Bend and so may alter the Impact alignment of the Clubface. See 6-E and 7-23. The long Backstroke Shoulder Turn produces CIRCLE Path (10-23-E) and ARC of Approach procedures. The short Shoulder Turn produces “LINE” types of Delivery Path (10-23) and “ANGLE” of Approach procedures (2-J-3). So – if the Shoulder Turn is too great and takes the Hands inside the proper Angle of Approach (2-J-3), then you must shift to an Arc of Approach Delivery Line to “clear the Right Hip” (2-J-3). Or get an unwanted Pull. OR A SHANK. Otherwise, the Three Dimensions will become un-correlated including Compression Leakage (2-C-0) and an obvious struggle. As it goes back, so it tends to come down – because of the differences in Loading Characteristics (Components 11, 19, and 22).
Im in total agreement with all that. My first paragraph concerned the backstroke. The difference lies in the notion of the Right Shoulder being on Plane in Startdown as opposed to a notion of the Plane of the Shoulders being aligned to the Inclined Plane. The first one is genius, the second .............awkward. Im all for a Standard Shoulder Turn and a Turned Shoulder Plane. Flat back and then On Plane going down.
The Plane of the Shoulders and the Plane of Motion of the Hands do not need to be aligned. My apologies to Jim Hardy although I think the One Planers align the Plane of the Shoulders to the Plane of the Left ARm and Homer didnt have either of those components on his Inclined Plane. For a Standard Shoulder Turn , in Startup, the Right Shoulder will turn IN on a flat path and the Right Arm will fan BACK, IN and bend UP. They dont move in the same direction. Their vectors are divergent. The on plane force is resultant but under direction of the Brain through its outpost in the Hands, the Pressure Points. Just like hitting a tennis ball. You dont align your pivot to the ball, you align your hand path (or the racquet heads extension of it) to the balls path. The pivot still contributes greatly but its the Hand path that is aligned. Hands to Pivot is obvious in all applications except for golf for some reason. The legacy of the one piece takeaway , or a misconception of it maybe?
Shoulder turn takeaway takes the Hands in the direction the Shoulders are traveling........always under plane..........although some people try to align the Shoulders Plane to the Inclined Plane to correct the Hand Path.........which is unnecessary. Just Trace with your brain in your #3 and let 'em go in their own direction, going back anyways. See the McDonald drills. In Startdown its a different story assuming the TSP. There the Right Shoulder and the Hands meet up on the Inclined Plane at Top and travel down plane together in Startdown under the power of the Right Shoulder. But still under the direction of the Brain via the Hands.
Basically if your Tracing you're Hands to Pivot. See the glossaries definition of the Pivot.
Shoulder turn takeaway takes the Hands in the direction the Shoulders are traveling
Who says that you can't do both simultaneously? That's what I'm doing when I play my best golf. Feels like starting the back swing with feet and arms basically.
Daryl,
Thanks for a very thorough and very advanced reply. I'm not sure if I understand all of what you say.
My problem with single plane is that I am no good at it. And one of the issues I have is that I loose the sense of right hand control in the down stroke.
Being a plane shifter I don't see my own ball striking in you description. I use the hands a lot - for distance & trajectory control. The pivot for sure doesn't control nor command what the hands do. And the hands aren't able control the pivot either. Right hand lag pressure is key to distance control on less than full shots.
I find it much easier to achieve a stable pressure point balance and a steady clubhead through the ball on the elbow plane than any other plane.
Of course, all of this may be due to personal style & preferences.
Who says that you can't do both simultaneously? That's what I'm doing when I play my best golf. Feels like starting the back swing with feet and arms basically.
Yes , exactly do both as opposed to merely a shoulder turn takeaway. Hands to Pivot does not mean that the Pivot does not start things going in Startup. The pivot can provide the initial move away, but given an intention to Trace it will become Hands to Pivot. I too feel like my best golf sees my pivot getting things started in Startup. The first few inches or whatever. My right hip turns back accompanied by a lagging takeaway, then my right forearm fans and picks up. All the time Im Tracing.
Again, if your Tracing you're good. Hands to Pivot.
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!
I can educate my hands to travel the correct path to the ball if I can take ppt #3 to the ball, effectively?
Patrick
Originally Posted by O.B.Left
Im in total agreement with all that. My first paragraph concerned the backstroke. The difference lies in the notion of the Right Shoulder being on Plane in Startdown as opposed to a notion of the Plane of the Shoulders being aligned to the Inclined Plane. The first one is genius, the second .............awkward. Im all for a Standard Shoulder Turn and a Turned Shoulder Plane. Flat back and then On Plane going down.
The Plane of the Shoulders and the Plane of Motion of the Hands do not need to be aligned. My apologies to Jim Hardy although I think the One Planers align the Plane of the Shoulders to the Plane of the Left ARm and Homer didnt have either of those components on his Inclined Plane. For a Standard Shoulder Turn , in Startup, the Right Shoulder will turn IN on a flat path and the Right Arm will fan BACK, IN and bend UP. They dont move in the same direction. Their vectors are divergent. The on plane force is resultant but under direction of the Brain through its outpost in the Hands, the Pressure Points. Just like hitting a tennis ball. You dont align your pivot to the ball, you align your hand path (or the racquet heads extension of it) to the balls path. The pivot still contributes greatly but its the Hand path that is aligned. Hands to Pivot is obvious in all applications except for golf for some reason. The legacy of the one piece takeaway , or a misconception of it maybe?
Shoulder turn takeaway takes the Hands in the direction the Shoulders are traveling........always under plane..........although some people try to align the Shoulders Plane to the Inclined Plane to correct the Hand Path.........which is unnecessary. Just Trace with your brain in your #3 and let 'em go in their own direction, going back anyways. See the McDonald drills. In Startdown its a different story assuming the TSP. There the Right Shoulder and the Hands meet up on the Inclined Plane at Top and travel down plane together in Startdown under the power of the Right Shoulder. But still under the direction of the Brain via the Hands.
Basically if your Tracing you're Hands to Pivot. See the glossaries definition of the Pivot.
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!
I can educate my hands to travel the correct path to the ball if I can take ppt #3 to the ball, effectively?
Patrick
The quick answer is yes. That would be Hands to Pivot.
The long answer....... Homer said that the "Hands are not educated until they control the pivot".
He also defined the Pivot as "A multiple universal-joint assembly between the the Stationary Head and the Startionalry Feet holding the Clubshaft "On Plane" by positioning and adjusting the Lever Assembly, through the #3 Accumulator , as directed by the Right Forearm".
He also said that the #3pp was at the top of the Longitudinal Center of Gravity the Sweetspot Plane, which is what CF is really swinging On Plane as opposed to the clubshaft. Meaning that the feeling at the #3pp is the feeling of the Sweetspot.
So to direct the #3pp is to direct the Sweetspot , so to speak. And if your pivot complies in a manner that promotes this Tracing or Thrusting at the Aiming Point, which ever you prefer...........then the answer to your question is....yes. And you are therefor Hands to Pivot.
Again I say, if you are Tracing , or if you prefer Thrusting at the Aiming Point, you are Hands to Pivot. Pivot to Hands is the Pivot throwing the Hands off plane. If they are on plane...........you dont have a problem. Homer said "A Shoulder Turn Takeaway is always under plane". If you are on plane , despite your Shoulders contribution to the backstroke powering .......you are good, Hands to Pivot. Something that can only be accomplished if the Pivot and the Arms , Zones 1 and 2 travel in different directions. The Shoulder Turn Takeaway Homer refers to is one where the Shoulders and Arms are locked together and travel as a single unit. United by tension at the Arm to Shoulder connection or via Pressure Point blackout, ignorance.
Homer said "A Shoulder Turn Takeaway is always under plane".
.....
The Shoulder Turn Takeaway Homer refers to is one where the Shoulders and Arms are locked together and travel as a single unit. United by tension at the Arm to Shoulder connection or via Pressure Point blackout, ignorance.
I'm bringing this back to life as I had an interesting experience today.
Out on the course. Struggling because I am still mixing patterns. I eventually found a swing that had power. And kept it for the remaining holes. Last two holes were driver - sand wedge on a 420 yard par 4 - and then 3 wood + 5 wood on a 480 yard par 5. Both holes were in benign wind conditions, but this was good ball striking by my standard. And the 5 wood was climbing towards the moon before it dropped dead on the green. With a Pinnacle ball. In down wind. What a shot
I was using something that must have been very close to turned sholder plane. More hip tilt than I usually do. Facing straight at the ball. ( I usualy face above the ball)
And adjusting my stance to pretty normal square address position.
The power center of the swing was higher up in my pivot than usual. It felt like ii turned the club around a point almost as high as the shoulders. Whereas normally, the power center is around the belly button and I stand erect to the ball.
Back home I was able to reproduce this stroke pattern and the one that is my regular patter. (Amazing how much easier it is to do these things away from the course.)
I noted another significant difference: The pattern I use today has both arms straigth a little past impact. The pattern I usually use have both arms straight when the arms are horizontal into the follow through. Quite a lot more pivot and hands speed through the ball. Not more swing speed but a lot more thrust. And a greater sense of stability and connectedness through impact.
I have to address the ball wit an open stance to do my normal pattern. And I have to start the back swing from the feet to get the club on plane. This must be because I start from an address position where my pivot is extensively rotated. It is geometrically open (seen from above) but physically it is still closed.
Reflection upon the differences, it seems to basically be a timing difference. In the stock TGM swing, you start with a forarm pickup, and by hip height or so, the pivot and arms move in unison. That's a place where everyting is very well connected. And that's the place where i address my ball, so to speak. I've just turned everything through to a point where everything is connected. And I have moved the ball much closer to the release.
There's just no running out of anything until way past the ball. Running out of right arm is a no isse, since it basically is turning together with the pivot. Today I was aiming my pp#1 and #3 out towards the ball. The stock TGM way of doing it. Usually I aim them straight through the ball on the target line.
It is perhaps needless to say, but I'll say it anyway. What goes up tends to come down again. If you start with arms only in the back swing it will basically be arms at impact. But if you start with an address position that requires engagement from the feet, and with pivot and arms together, so will your motion be through impact.
Hybrid Mode
