Hogan Right Shoulder Motion Elbow Plane Hitter - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Hogan Right Shoulder Motion Elbow Plane Hitter

Emergency Room - Hitters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2011, 02:21 PM
fladan fladan is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Master Instructor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 27
CP and CF motions - Mac O'Grady
Lynn asked me to reply to the general discussion regarding CP (centripetal force)
and CF (centrifugal force) motions per Mac O'Grady. Here goes:

By way of explanation, I "managed" Mac's schools for six and half years (2001 - 2008 ). I attended over 30 schools and was part of the teaching team for these schools. I was also, at the time, one of two people allowed to use the MORAD
logo for my teaching.

CF motion uses a lateral shift of the hips beginning the downswing, with the left arm angled about 20 degrees inside to the target line at the point the left arm is parallel to the ground (know as Position 5). The right elbow moves toward the right hip. Then the right arm begins to straighten when the club is parallel to the ground (P6). The hips "elevate" to impact. Flight of the ball is predominantly a push to push/fade, although any flight is possible via club face position. Generally, it is always a higher flight than a CP motion.

A CP motion is an outward force - the rotation of the left shoulder is more level to the ground - horizontal (Mac believes the left shoulder position is monitored, not the right shoulder). The hands are brought predominantly outward, rather than moving downward, and the left arm is parallel to the target line at P5 (see above). This rotational motion is continued through impact. This motion produces a lower trajectory, and a left to right ball flight (generally).

I can tell you that a CP motion is a body driven motion - very little to no shifting of the hips, and a lower finish vs. the CF finish.

The key point with regard to other posts is that both motions are body and/or left arm driven - the right arm is not flimsy, but does not play a major role in either swing model.

At least according to Mac....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2011, 04:18 PM
brianmontgomery2000's Avatar
brianmontgomery2000 brianmontgomery2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 153
Originally Posted by fladan View Post
The key point with regard to other posts is that both motions are body and/or left arm driven - the right arm is not flimsy, but does not play a major role in either swing model.

At least according to Mac....
So, there is no "hitting" pattern in MORAD?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2011, 06:09 PM
gmbtempe's Avatar
gmbtempe gmbtempe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 392
Very tough making Mac O' Grady statements as he changes stuff all the time as his research continues.

Loves the yellow book though
__________________
"The only real shortcuts are more and more know how"...TGM
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2011, 06:27 PM
BerntR's Avatar
BerntR BerntR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 981
Daryl,

Are you talking about the right forearm being on the inclined plane at impact here?

Is what you mean by the RF return to the right angle of approach?
__________________
Best regards,

Bernt
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2011, 06:57 PM
Daryl's Avatar
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by BerntR View Post
Daryl,

Are you talking about the right forearm being on the inclined plane at impact here?

Is what you mean by the RF return to the right angle of approach?
At Impact Fix, the Primary Lever is In line with a Flat and Level Left Wrist and the Right Forearm Wedge is "Intact" with a Level and Bent Right Wrist and the "Forearm" is Against the underside of the Plane while the #3 PP is On-Plane tracing the Plane Line. The Right Forearm while against the Plane is Angled Down, Forward and Outward. That's the Forearm Angle of Approach. It's not just the Angle, but it's the Angle of the Right Forearm when the Wedges are Intact, especially the Right Forearm Flying Wedge.
__________________
Daryl
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:05 PM
fladan fladan is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Master Instructor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 27
more mac"isms"
As I have discussed with Yoda, I do think Mac's CF and CP models reflect swinging and hitting patterns, but in Mac's terms.

The one point of contention I had with Mac is both swing models are from the same top of backswing position - it is a long way to CP motion from an "arc of approach" top of swing position (as compared to "angle of approach". Also, in neither case is the right forearm driving during the downswing/release.

This discussion is not about Mac; but I think his work is very valuable and as all of us should, he and we, are trying to continue Homer's work.

I haven't watched Mr. Erickson's discussion but I will definitely do so. I'm sure his insights will be valuable to us all. Thanks for the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:52 PM
O.B.Left O.B.Left is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,433
Originally Posted by fladan View Post
As I have discussed with Yoda, I do think Mac's CF and CP models
reflect swinging and hitting patterns, but in Mac's terms.

The one point of contention I had with Mac is both swing models are from the same top of backswing position - it is a long way to CP motion from an "arc of approach" top of swing position (as compared to "angle of approach". Also, in neither case is the right forearm driving during the downswing/release.

This discussion is not about Mac; but I think his work is very
valuable and as all of us should, he and we, are trying to continue Homer's work.

I haven't watched Mr. Erickson's discussion but I will definitely do so. I'm sure his insights will be valuable to us all. Thanks for the time.


Glad you're here fladan, very interesting stuff.

Nice to hear these things from someone who got it first hand (and understood it).......sorta like talking about all things Homer with Lynn. No broken telephone so to speak.

During one of my first breakfasts with Lynn, I believe at the Cracker Barrel in Marieta....I asked him about all these other definitions of TGM things I was reading here and there. Lynn paused then made a motion as if to pull an I.V. out of his forearm arm and then held it to my arm, looked me right in the eye and said " its a mainline....from Homer to me and now to you. What you are getting is not second hand or third, its first hand".

That moment kinda stuck with me, you might say. That was a great day all around actually, in many ways.


Ob

Last edited by O.B.Left : 01-05-2011 at 10:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:37 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
Dan Malizia, PGA, LBCSI
Originally Posted by fladan View Post

Lynn asked me to reply to the general discussion regarding CP (centripetal force)and CF (centrifugal force) motions per Mac O'Grady. Here goes:

By way of explanation, I "managed" Mac's schools for six and half years (2001 - 2008 ). I attended over 30 schools and was part of the teaching team for these schools. I was also, at the time, one of two people allowed to use the MORAD logo for my teaching.

CF motion uses a lateral shift of the hips beginning the downswing, with the left arm angled about 20 degrees inside to the target line at the point the left arm is parallel to the ground (know as Position 5). The right elbow moves toward the right hip. Then the right arm begins to straighten when the club is parallel to the ground (P6). The hips "elevate" to impact. Flight of the ball is predominantly a push to push/fade, although any flight is possible via club face position. Generally, it is always a higher flight than a CP motion.

A CP motion is an outward force - the rotation of the left shoulder is more level to the ground - horizontal (Mac believes the left shoulder position is monitored, not the right shoulder). The hands are brought predominantly outward, rather than moving downward, and the left arm is parallel to the target line at P5 (see above). This rotational motion is continued through impact. This motion produces a lower trajectory, and a left to right ball flight (generally).

I can tell you that a CP motion is a body driven motion - very little to no shifting of the hips, and a lower finish vs. the CF finish.

The key point with regard to other posts is that both motions are body and/or left arm driven - the right arm is not flimsy, but does not play a major role in either swing model.

At least according to Mac....


Dan,

Thanks so much for this great post and your follow-up above. Your years of experience with Mac is an invaluable resource, especially now when combined with your knowledge of The Golfing Machine.

I have had many students -- amateur and professional -- but none more dedicated to the pursuit of learning and mastery of the teaching craft. It has been my pleasure and privilege to watch your dedicated pursuit over the past 2 1/2 years. Impressive.

And I know you've been "eating your own cooking": Those mid-sixties scores you've been posting lately are getting b-o-r-i-n-g! I think you're getting it!

Proud to have you aboard, Dan, as my friend, student, counselor, and Lynn Blake Certified Senior Instructor. Thanks again for your many contributions to LBG and the benchmark of professionalism you set for us all.

__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.