[Yoda]

Lynn,

Thanks for the question.

Are you teaching people to produce seperation at lowpoint as described in 2-C-1#3 to produce maximum compression (no "glancing force") and a dead straight shot?

I doubt it.

Clearly, you understand and respect D plane well enough to know that this is the only way you can phrase a question that matches the book in some way.

It's not really the geometry of the circle as I see it drawn on napkins, easels and pieces of paper is it?

This was my experience and I still have not been convinced.

Again, I am quite open to discussion.

John,

Thank you for thanking me for my question. Actually, there were several questions, but for whatever the reason, you chose not to answer even one of them.



Let's revisit the situation:

My questions referenced the Impact alignments of Sketch 2-C-1 #3 and asked that your answers address those alignments specifically.

I asked you simple, straightforward questions that deserved simple, straightforward answers.

I did not ask you to ask me a question regarding my teaching.

Nor did I ask you to ask me a question regarding your perception of the "geometry of the circle as .... drawn on napkins, easels and pieces of paper".

Finally, I did not ask for your comment as to how I chose to "phrase" my question.

So, let's begin again . . .

Please answer my questions. In the interest of brevity, let's make it even more simple and focus on just the first question:

Will the Impact alignments as illustrated in 2-C-1 #3 produce a dead straight shot? Or will they not?

No "discussion" required.

One word will do.