CF in hitting.

[Bumpy]

Let's keep it simple;
1-L - 9. Regardless of how the Lever Assembly is driven, it moves in a circle.

HB

Do U include any cf in your hitting procedure? if so, where, how, and how much?

hb

If there is angular motion there is CF, but its effect on release are zeroed by the hitter. See: 6-F-0

Bumpy

[BerntR]

Not zeroed, Bumpy.

It is getting "help" by the driveout. Or the driveout is getting help from CF. They help each other.

[MizunoJoe]

Not zeroed, Bumpy.

It is getting "help" by the driveout. Or the driveout is getting help from CF. They help each other.

Driveout is providing the motion, which you claim is generating CF, which you then claim "helps" Driveout??? Sounds like the basis for a perpetual motion machine!

Throwout is preempted by Driveout. If CF were present in releasing #3, then the left arm would be the delivery mechanism, forcing #4 to be a PA in Hitting. But per 12-1-0, Hitting is Triple Barrel(1/2/3) not 4-barrel(1/2/3/4).

[whip]

The oil companies wouldn't allow that mj that's why magnetic engines haven't caught on

[Bumpy]

If there is angular motion there is CF, but its effect on release are zeroed by the hitter. See: 6-F-0

Bumpy

Not zeroed, Bumpy.

It is getting "help" by the driveout. Or the driveout is getting help from CF. They help each other.

OK, zeroed might be the wrong word, not sure help is correct either.


Per 6-F-0 ".....totally annuling and stifling any intrusion by CF".

If there is no intrusion, I'm going to regard its effect on the "overtaking rate" as PASSIVE.

If there was any "helping" going on I would be pulling and pushing at the same time.


Bumpy


=================
------
---
-
--------------

[whip]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

[HungryBear]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

Could U be a little more specific?

hb

[Bumpy]

There AIN'T NO C.F. IN TRUE HITTING END OF STORY HOMER WROTE THE BOOK THE END GO SPEND Forty YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH AND FELT BACK TO ME ALL YOU PIONEER'S IF GOLF THEOREM

Brilliant argument. Stating your perception then following that with Homer is right does not lend credibility by association. I think everybody agrees Homer is right. If your not capable of developing a valid argument you're just noise.

Bumpy

[O.B.Left]

The problem here again is one of definition. Golfers talking to golfers with science degrees. Homers unique definition of the word mixed in.

I get the feeling no one is wrong above its just a matter of interpretation.

There's no cf (in the pivot power sense of the word ) for Drive Loading but there is cf present in the primary lever . Then there's Hitting with Pivot Power....

[HungryBear]

The problem here again is one of definition. Golfers talking to golfers with science degrees. Homers unique definition of the word mixed in.

I get the feeling no one is wrong above its just a matter of interpretation.

There's no cf (in the pivot power sense of the word ) for Drive Loading but there is cf present in the primary lever . Then there's Hitting with Pivot Power....

OB - I did not mean to get everyone to a "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" question. The question, in my mind, was clear but after all the comments it is not.

One can putt with a little push stroke. As more power is needed #3 and #2 and pivot is increased.
There are proportions, I was looking for others ideas.

Thats all. how do U handle the balance?

HB