[innercityteacher]

Thanks O.B.

Perhaps the subject should not be approached.

There is sameness and difference.

As I understand. The sameness is in the 24 components. The differences are within the selection of elements within each of the 24.

HK says there is no THE WAY. Selection becomes personal.

BUT

2 categories were implicitly created, hit or swing, which may create a de facto THE WAY. 2 actions-hit or swing.

Should this be?

Chapter 12 creates a pattern selection process and these 2 selected patterns.

But aren't these patterns hortatory, not obligatory? Then why?

The only touch-point is 10-19-(A for one and C for the other or B for either)?

I did not push Humpty-Dumpty off the wall, I just nudged him, Chapter 14 is for pushing.


“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’ ” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’ ”
“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master that’s all.”
Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. “They’ve a temper, some of them—particularly verbs, they’re the proudest—adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs—however, I can manage the whole lot! Impenetrability! That’s what I say!”

You’re going to have to ask the Judge what that means.

The Bear

But I am limited to standing on the ground with two feet. I can either pull or push. I can rotate with either or both feet planted and then I both pull and push depending on the rest of the moves being made.

Now, "Alice" and her friends are works of fiction. I really like fiction but only as it furthers the understanding of facts. I can't remember the book title but the point of the book was that human language needs to be repetitive and a much smaller circle than pure mathematics since there is a very short list of what can happen to a person. There is "nothing new under the sun." However, there are new technologies that happen all the time. A person can hit a golf ball. They can hit it with lots of differing technologies. So the event list of what we can do is rather short but the instrument list is rather undefined. Jerry plays music but does so on different instruments in different places to differing degrees of excellence but it is still playing music.

We push and pull a golf club (nice and simple Bernt ) though we might have cork in the driver or Kevlar.

Alice and HD are arguing about something a lot less grounded than our biomechanical frame. You might be a reader of some of the literary dust-ups in England or France over the use of commas or what constitutes a "real" word. Good fun! And in your quote, as I understand it, HD is actually backing itself into Alice's point. Anyway, good fun, great book!

I would think that Ernest Jones would be an interesting study regarding this idea. Lag the penknife back and through but thrusting for him was tough, I bet.

ICT