[Daryl]

I've read TGM hundreds of times. I may see seemingly small things in the book that others miss. I haven't found anything yet that can't be pointed out in the book. I'm not saying the book is perfect, but it is complete. But I think it's a personal problem for me, when people criticize the book for what they think is missing rather than enjoying the Book for what's included and what it represents.

His Spine Engine Theory is a "Sweep Release" without "Hip Action". It's been done. Nothing new here.

I've enjoyed reading his "Revisiting the Kinetic Link Principle" and Multiple Firing Theory many times. I'm always looking for something new.

The fact that we have multiple pivot theories doesn't deny the fact that we all have the same body parts and Swing Components. We just use the components in different ways or omit them or turn some on and off (Zero them out or Maximize them). Any Pivot is legitimate if it allows or helps to create and Sustain the Line of Compression by allowing the Arms and Hands to perform their functions.

I know of dozens of Pivot procedures as does Kelvin. I just saying that focusing on one and demoting others isn't necessary. When anyone focuses on "THE Theory", then it's time to chant the TGM Mantra: "there is only one Swing Geometry, but the procedures and combination's are endless". (I made that up).....