[nuke99]

Of course , I am not qualified to give any thesis .

But I think golf is a game, where there is no perfect options. To a very huge extend, its Comfort and feel preference, and maybe even Illusions.

As long as you find a way that the shoulder joint to club position have the same position and radius all the time, you hit good balls. John Daly, Jim Furyk.


However, Since you agree that TGM is geometrically correct.

Can you also agree that, The less thing you have to move or monitor is thus less compensation. I think That is the true meaning of what is compensation.

Or kindly explain what is your meaning of compensation, compensating for what we feel? This is the impression i got from your thesis.

The less thing you have to move,
1. The more confident you have to apply maximum lag pressure.
2. The less thing you have to monitor and train. And the more accurate you are from day to day thus less compensation.


Though I remember , something someone said, i think its very deep.

In Pivot controlled hands, Physics Precedes
Hand controlled pivot, Geometry precedes

So I believe, body controlled hands or people trying to use their body to generate power, will like to feel momentum transfer, thus the said phenomenum. Ben hogan pushing the right heel etc.

But at the end of the day. As long as you can strike the way you like it , ball after ball after ball . its your correct way.

Nothing to argue about really and not worth getting confused about.

David Orr didn't mind his students with a slight BOB. Why should us ?