[birdie_man]

It seems to me, that this is the only thing that ever seems to get debated.

Ya it is a hot topic it seems. (important tho no?...look at all the responses even)

Look how easily we got on it this time around.

I notice in another place in cyberspace that there is pictures of Lynn with a tripod (from a 10-5-E variation for hitting and a handheld hence non-level camera that is not square on the plane line, playing in the middle of winter in a windy day and I think he said he had 5 layers of clothes on - I might add). Through my work in 3d - just a few degrees out and you can find that you can totally change the impression of things. I mean its laughable, this is the guy that said he needs some solid scientific proof and he then takes from a ghosty and double compressed video and makes some suspicious pictures. Do you recon these where good conditions from which to judge???

Yes.

Lack of their knowledge never allows them to debate anything else...

Yes.

Unfortunately for the naysayers, this does not detract from the principle. And for every person that you can find that sways, I can find one with a perfectly centered pivot. There is the ideal and like in every game you play, every deviation of it - you lose....

It is possible and it is correct...

"Possible" I of course have no problem with. Even "possible to play world class golf with extreme precision"...no problem with that whatsoever.

Again: "Whatever works (best)."

...

However, it is "correct" (or "perfect" or "always ideal" or "superior" or w/e other rigid words) that I do not like....

...when it is given as the only option I mean.

And in my opinion, "you lose" is incorrect, or (at the very least) very incomplete.