The book was very interesting and enjoyable.
BUT the ending should have been about Lynnblakegolf.com
In my opinion Lynn is the real revival to the Golfing Machine.
The book mentions that Morgan Presel knows nothing about
Homer Kelley and has never read the book, makes one wonder.
How could one study the principles of the The Golfing
Machine for years and never find the interest to read the
book? I wonder why Martin Hall did not not bring the
Homer Kelley termanology into his teaching for her?
Although I enjoyed the book, I feel that Lynn Blake
did not get the credit he deserved for bringing the
Golfing Machine out for all to see.
The book was very interesting and enjoyable.
BUT the ending should have been about Lynnblakegolf.com
In my opinion Lynn is the real revival to the Golfing Machine.
The book mentions that Morgan Presel knows nothing about
Homer Kelley and has never read the book, makes one wonder.
How could one study the principles of the The Golfing
Machine for years and never find the interest to read the
book? I wonder why Martin Hall did not not bring the
Homer Kelley terminology into his teaching for her?
Although I enjoyed the book, I feel that Lynn Blake
did not get the credit he deserved for bringing the
Golfing Machine out for all to see.
Donn Kerby
I'm not saying this about Martin Hall, because I don't know him or what he teaches. But most TGM Golf Instructors who don't completely understand the Concepts re-invent the method. They need to "fill-in-their-knowledge-gaps" with other methods to complete the picture. This leads them not to abandon TGM altogether, but modify it in way they Claim is more easier for the average Joe to understand. But over simplifying just makes it harder.
Quote:
1-B....Treating a complex subject or action as though it were simple, multiplies its complexity because of the difficulty in systematizing missing and unknown factors and elements. Demanding that golf instruction be kept simple does not make it simple – only incomplete and ineffective. Unless this is recognized, golf remains vague, frustrating, infuriating form of exertion.
IMHO, TGM is about the teacher not the student. The student does not need to know about Homer Kelley although that would be rewarding.
Originally Posted by dkerby
The book was very interesting and enjoyable.
BUT the ending should have been about Lynnblakegolf.com
In my opinion Lynn is the real revival to the Golfing Machine.
The book mentions that Morgan Presel knows nothing about
Homer Kelley and has never read the book, makes one wonder.
How could one study the principles of the The Golfing
Machine for years and never find the interest to read the
book? I wonder why Martin Hall did not not bring the
Homer Kelley termanology into his teaching for her?
Although I enjoyed the book, I feel that Lynn Blake
did not get the credit he deserved for bringing the
Golfing Machine out for all to see.
I just finished the book and I liked it very much. I learned a lot about Mr. Kelley and even if some of the TGM terms are not exactly right (said locked instead of cocked in one spot that I remember) it was a fun, fast read.
I really liked the story of how Mr. Kelley worked on the ideas (or carots as he called them), how he found Diane to be his model, and how the book got published and used. If you are into TGM and want some more information on Homer then get the book. I can't attest to how accurate the information is and I am sure there are other errors but this is one of the few biographies that I have totally enjoyed cover to cover.
All in all, I thought it was very well done and would recommend it to anyone who is interested in TGM. I even bought an extra copy to send to my brother in law (he is a TGM devotee from way back....got me hooked).
__________________
Kevin
------------------------------------------
Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.
Last edited by kmmcnabb : 05-26-2009 at 10:25 AM.
Reason: missing parenthesis
IMHO, TGM is about the teacher not the student. The student does not need to know about Homer Kelley although that would be rewarding.
One problem with MHO, which has been brought to my attention, is that Mr Kelley intended that his book "serve as the Duffer's Bible, the Golf Nut's Catalog, the Circuit Player's Handbook and the Instructor's Textbook."
Just finished reading Scott Gummers book on Homer & TGM, found it very interesting story on Homer and TGM.
I have 5 versions of TGM my first 3rd edition I just sold, but wish I hadn't since reading this book. Seem's that 6th edition was the last Homer peersonally updated, and the 3rd was his best.
All in all, I think Scott Gummers the author did a nice job.
Ironically, I had 1/2 day lessons with two of Homer's first AI's
Ben Doyle and Tom Tomesello, neither of which could help my overly long swing. I know that TT was a hitter and Ben teaches swinging, I know TGM's 3 basic imperatives are correct but I still "flip" my wrist too much.
Im almost at the end of the book. Had to put it down for a while after reading about Bobby Clampett's loss at The Open.
I find it to be a great story and very well written.
The only question I have so far, is that while Homer did shoot 77 some five months after his first proper game, I dont believe it was his second time out as suggested. Anyone have an opinion on this?
I find it to be a great story and very well written.
The only question I have so far, is that while Homer did shoot 77 some five months after his first proper game, I dont believe it was his second time out as suggested. Anyone have an opinion on this?
Right you are, O.B.
Unforunately, the author (and those he may have relied on for accurate information) dropped the ball on this one. Homer Kelley played many rounds between the end of his indoor training and the 77 he himself referenced in the preface to the first three editions (1969, 1971 and 1975). Also per these first three editions, the time was four months (not five).
Too bad, as this fantastic statement strains credibility from the outset ("outset" being defined as the introductory notes on the dust cover's inside flap).
Linear Mode
