I saw the videos and in my opinion Jack Kuykendall did not come over well. This statement switches me right off
The Greatest Physics Discovery in the History of Golf!
In July of 1997, I made the greatest physics discovery in the history of golf. I discovered a new lever system that allows golfers to hit balls farther and straighter with the virtual elimination of strain on the back and shoulders. In less than 90-days, any golfer can began to change memory patterns to a repeatable mechanical motion that will allow for consistent and accurate golf shots for the rest of his/her life. My new training device (patent pending) forces the correct motion to be made.
I think there is a case for looking at his stroke patern and breaking it down into it's various components. I think you will find that that it is no discovery but the method he is selling.
I think there is a case for looking at his stroke patern and breaking it down into it's various components. I think you will find that that it is no discovery but the method he is selling.
I think that would require based on my limited understanding of his method, a number of 'X' classifications of components. Also I am not sure his description/concepts tracks with the concepts of TGM.
The question is at what point do too many 'X' classifications and the advocation of different concepts take it out of what could be accurately described by TGM?