What is the difference between alingments and positions? Aren't alingments actually positions too?
I may just be missing the precived image by TGM. Can someone explain the difference?
It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.
It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.
It's better to achieve "Positions" through "Alignments" than "Alignments" through "Positions". If "Alignments" change, then "Positions" change. The reverse is not true.
Sweet, Alignments in Motion...
Kevin
__________________
I could be wrong. I have been before, and will be again.
What is the difference between alingments and positions? Aren't alingments actually positions too?
I may just be missing the precived image by TGM. Can someone explain the difference?
An alignment describes the relationship of more than one position to a standard of measurement. An alignment takes into account a certain context - the measurement of more than one position in relation to the same standard - maintaining the same relatonship to that standard. When creating the concept for a position one doesn't take into account more than one position and therefore doesn't try to relate two positions (motion) to a common standard of measurement.
To see an alignment as a position you have to drop, forget, ignore the "context" i.e. the standard of measurement being used and the constant relationship to that standard.
__________________
Life Goal- Developing a new theory of movement based on Brain Science
Interests - Dabbling with insanity
Hobbies- Creating Quality
An alignment describes the relationship of more than one position to a standard of measurement. An alignment takes into account a certain context - the measurement of more than one position in relation to the same standard - maintaining the same relatonship to that standard. When creating the concept for a position one doesn't take into account more than one position and therefore doesn't try to relate two positions (motion) to a common standard of measurement.
To see an alignment as a position you have to drop, forget, ignore the "context" i.e. the standard of measurement being used and the constant relationship to that standard.
What is the difference between alignments and positions? Aren't alignments actually positions too?
I may just be missing the perceived image by TGM. Can someone explain the difference?
Positions are a player's means of executing pre-selected, precision alignments. To that end, alignments require positions.
However, a given 'position' can be executed perfectly -- for example, left elbow down, right elbow in, right arm L-position at the top, roll the wrists through the ball, full shoulder turn, etc. -- and yet the player still can miss the ball.
All the action of the golf club takes place on a flat, inflexible inclined Plane. The clubshaft remains on the face of the Plane. EVERY other Component of the Stroke must be adjusted to comply with that requirement. It is the Heart and Soul of the Sroke.
Linear Mode
